Clerk Of Assize: What Have You To Say Why Judgment Should Not


be passed upon you according to law? Prisoner: Well, my Lord, my wife

took up with a hawker, and run away five years ago, and I've never seen

her since, and I married this other woman last winter. Mr. Justice

Maule: I will tell you what you ought to have done; and if you say you

did not know, I must tell you the law conclusively presumes that you

did. You ought to have instructed your attorney to bring an action

agains
the hawker for criminal conversation with your wife. That would

have cost you about L100. When you had recovered substantial damages

against the hawker, you would have instructed your proctor to sue in the

Ecclesiastical Courts for a divorce a mensa atque thoro. That would

have cost you L200 or L300 more. When you had obtained a divorce a

mensa atque thoro, you would have had to appear by counsel before the

House of Lords for a divorce a vinculo matrimonii. The bill might have

been opposed in all its stages in both Houses of Parliament; and

altogether you would have had to spend about L1000 or L1200. You will

probably tell me that you never had a thousand farthings of your own in

the world; but, prisoner, that makes no difference. Sitting here as a

British judge, it is my duty to tell you that this is not a country in

which there is one law for the rich and another for the poor.



More

;