Most Viewed
A Walking Stick
Erudite
An Honor To Tipperary
Welsh Wig-ging
White Teeth
An East Indian Chaplaincy
Idolatry
Witty Coward
A New Sign
Epigram
Least Viewed
Epigram
A Good Reason
A Bad Crop
Black And White
Extremes Meet
Walpoliana
A Nice Distinction
Confidence
Measure For Measure
Good Advice
Random Jests
An Illegal Indorsement
A Military Axiom
Going From The Point
The Scold's Vocabulary
Nicknames
Sir Thomas Coulson
Law And The Scottish Thane
Benefit Of Competition
A Deserved Retort
Dogmatism
|
The Spirit And The Letter
Jests Home
A MAN was described in a plea as I. Jones, and the pleader referred
in another part of the plea to I as an initial. The plaintiff said
that the plea was bad, because I was not a name. Sir W. Maule said
that there was no reason why a man might not be christened I as well
as Isaac, inasmuch as either could be pronounced alone. The counsel for
the plaintiff then objected that the plea admitted that I was not a
name by describing it as an initial.--Yes, retorted the judge, but
it does not aver that it is not a final as well as an initial
letter.
Next: Losing An I Previous: A Novel Idea
Viewed 307
|